Ancient Greek Marital and Gender Roles

antediluvian patriarch classical married and Gender Roles *Note All claims be assumptions based off of school school textual clues and atomic number 18 non to be dumb as fact nevertheless to be recognized as potential truths. The determinations of hands and wo opuspower in antediluvian classical refine custodyt pot never be fully understood since no adept alive today existed during their era. That being said, synopsis of texts compose by old-fashivirtuosod Grecian authors provides us with insight into how their polish viewed two sexs. It is through these texts that scholars can grow customary actions of single and marry couples.Questions such(prenominal) as should women save themselves for marriage, Are men the providers, And were women anticipate to be instrumental in a patriarchal society can all be answered through textual taste. As we prep ar to dive into ancient texts and pick up around the Hellenic culture of old, integrity must understand the richness of utilizing multiple authors. Without calling upon a variety of texts, a credible and consummate(a) theory on how superannuated Grecian individuals acted can non be erected.For the purposes of this analysis the authors Euripides, Aeschylus, and bell ringer ordain be employed with the scene of further understanding superannuated Greek gender and marital roles. Taking into account the differences among these texts in theme and date, we will burden trio main tasks identify what makes a honourable conserve and darling wife, discern if and why one role receives a great deal maintenance than the other, and conclude what ancient Greek social averages whitethorn constitute been from the way these texts depict marital bloods. Euripides, Hippolytus, provides a sturdy backbone for understanding how Ancient Greek civilization viewed gender roles.Before reading a text it is important non to have a narrow scope. This gist that one should non only focus on the p erceived main character, besides rather consider how both character whitethorn depict an chance of the then stream culture. Despite being titled Hippolytus, it is significant not to only concentrate on the character Hippolytus. In fact, there may be just as much if not more(prenominal) to be learned from Phaedra. Phaedra, being the stepmother of Hippolytus, supplies a situation where her actions toward Hippolytus can be utilise in understanding the expected actions of married fe priapics toward single males. After Phaedra earns that her halt has disclosed the sensitive information about her ro piece of musictic feelings for Hippolytus to him and that he has spurned her she lets her own life out of shame. However, she leaves a note for her husband Hippolytus stimulate Theseus, claiming that his son has raped her. This action reveals that perhaps it was not un earthy for women to take their lives by and by being innerly violated. With that in mind, it may be inferred tha t sexual purity was expected of women, that once a charwoman has been tainted by a male who was not her partner she loses her respect, award, and desirability.In addition, Theseus reaction allows us to actualize regular(a) further into gender relationships and societal norms. Theseus takes the offensive against Hippolytus, cursing him and by and by causing his death. Nevertheless, rather of coming to the hasty conclusion that Theseus is emotionally vaporizable and lacking the ability to understand, it is pertinent that one stops and asks Why may he have acted this way? For where most mistakes be do in textual analysis is through hasty generalizations based on current era norms.Indeed, in todays world Theseus reaction would lead to his imprisonment and required meetings with a psychiatrist and this was not always so. In Ancient Greece adore was critical and helped in determining social status. Euripides lived during the end of the Iranian Wars and much like the notoriou s Spartans, the Athenians considered honor for themselves and their family to be of the utmost importance. With this in mind we will take another look at Theseus reaction and how it provides insight into Ancient Greek culture.It is possible that Theseus reaction would have been of the norm during his time. It was most likely seen as dishonorable to commit suicide as well as to lie therefore, Theseus would not dare question the claims made by his wife. Theseus was trying to protect his honor as well as that of his family by pickings action against he who had supposedly raped his wife. hunting lodge may have expected him to avenge Phaedras death. This shows that a married couple was a hygienic unit, that each must have combine in each other it was not their employment to question the account book of their partner.Bearing everything in mind it can be deduced that a costly husband is one who protects his family and a honorable wife one who is firm, even if it means taking their own life. Nevertheless, the male gender role stresses honor everyplace family. Moreover, when honor and family conflict, family loses hence the death of Hippolytus. Euripides portrayal of Hippolytus assists in depicting how men were expected to act in society. Hippolytus serves as a paradigm for a man who does not meet the standards of the societal norm. We are able to identify that Hippolytus is not a normal Athenian male because the goddess Aphrodite punishes him for his actions.He is a son who has not yet become a man he shows that it was not acceptable for males in Ancient society to resist maturity. His wish to extend abstinent, or more so his lack of sexual desire is common among the youth but not a matured male. Aphrodite is used to receiving extolment and worship from the male population and because Hippolytus does not worship her but instead the virgin goddess Artemis she chooses to punish him. His punishment allows us to infer that all men were required to seek out a woman when they reached the age of maturity.Those who did not most likely brought shame to themselves and their family. Moreover, it can be seen through the wildness on family, and sexual desire that procreation was not so much a choice as it is today but an obligation and occupation of each and every able-bodied male. Ultimately, Euripides Hippolytus sheds a lot of light on social norms regarding gender roles. During the time period in Ancient Greece spell Euripides was alive estimated mingled with 484 407 B. C. E. (Before Current Era) the prevalence of honor was paramount, effecting the actions and choices made by both males and females.It was the duty of the male to protect and maintain honor for his family by taking action against those who threaten or harm the fortitude of his family. solely first it is his societal obligation to wed a woman and do a family. On the other hand women are important members of society, their book of account bears weight in discussion and decision, it is their duty to love and protect their family as well as to maintain honor for themselves by being loyal companions even if it means taking their own life. Although the assumptions made off of textual clues in Hippolytus appear valid, it is still important to consider other ancient texts.The Odyssey by bell ringer is another text that provides clues toward how Ancient Greek civilization regarded gender and marital roles. There appears to be an undis allotable amount of enjoin supporting that there was a double standard between men and women on how they should act toward the opposite sex. Odysseus engages in sexual activities with a adult amount of women on his journey home to Ithaca. Whereas despite not having not seen her husband for twenty old age genus genus Penelope remains loyal even though she has a crowd of suitors desiring her bed.Odysseus behaviour leads to the belief that it was acceptable for Greek males to cheat on their wives. However, there is not en ough evidence that supports that his behavior was acceptable. Additionally his circumstances were not of the norm so it is unfair to imagine that Odysseus behavior corresponded with that of the average Greek male. The important part of Odysseus and Penelopes relationship that does speak to the social norms of society is the devotion held toward one another. Penelopes decision to remain loyal to her husband even afterwards twenty years of absence says a lot about Greek women.It can be inferred that marriage was a huge deal and homage an even bigger one. If Penelope had chosen another suitor beforehand knowing if Odysseus was dead or not then she could have potentially brought dishonor to herself and her family. The importance of loyalty and marriage is stressed by Penelopes actions. Additionally, she shows that to be a good wife is to be a committed wife. In comparison, although Odysseus is not loyal like Penelope, he shows that it is the duty of a husband to make it home to his wife and to always put family first.The fact that Odysseus wants more than anything to comeback home and see his wife so badly that he even gives up his potential life with calypso supports that commitment to ones family is the most important duty of a Greek male. When Odysseus does return home and recollects that suitors have overrun his house he takes action and eliminates all of them. Although it may be argued that a couple of the suitors were genuine, comme il faut mass and should not have been killed, his decision to kill all of them attests to the duties of a good husband.The suitors entering his home without verification of his death was a lead at his honor. It is from his decision to eliminate all of the suitors that we can learn about how Ancient Greek society viewed the male gender role. Men were expected to be strong and to protect the honor of their home, to enter discussion over who was the most in the wrong displayed weakness. In range for a man to reclaim his g ood name he must do forward with any and all threats. This notion toward the expectations for Ancient Greek male gender roles is further supported by the actions of Odysseus son Telemachus.Telemachus had never met his father but still decided to set out on an expedition to find him. The fact that Telemachus had never met Odysseus when he decided to risk his life to find him validates the importance of family. Clearly common ethics in Ancient Greek civilization endorsed family over everything. A son was expected to fight for his family no matter how close his relationship with the rest of his family may be. Normal male gender roles were to maintain honor and protect ones family.Homers The Odyssey and Euripides Hippolytus both share common characteristics in their insight into Ancient Greek marital and social gender roles. The overwhelming aspect of both texts that appears to be the focal quest of Ancient Greek culture is family commitment. All clues point toward both marital roles to be to preserve and protect the honor of ones family as well as the importance of having one. The assumption can be made that in order to be a good wife she must be loyal and honest, whereas to be a good husband he must also be devoted, putting his love ones before himself and honor above all else.There does not appear to be one gender that receives more attention, supporting that both genders played a vital role in ancient culture. In contrast with the introductory two texts, Aeschylus Oresteia Agamemnon offers a different approach in addressing Ancient Greek cultural norms relating to marital and gender roles. While Agamemnon is gone for ten years at the Trojan war his wife Clytemnestra conspires against him with her lover Aegisthus. To be fair, Agamemnon had sacrificed their missy in order to have the wind be on his side.Before we hold back let us analyze how this depicts Ancient Greek marital roles. The relationship between Agamemnon and Clytemnestra is incredibly strained after he sacrifices their daughter Iphigenia. However, if emotions are withheld it can be seen that perhaps Agamemnons marital and gender role supported his decision. As was seen with the death of Hippolytus, stemming from Theseus duty to uphold his principles, it can be inferred that the requirement for a male to preserve his honor comes before family.Although taking a different approach, Oresteia Agamemnon, has the analogous main principles regarding marital roles. Except this text allows us to see what happens when roles compete. As the story progresses more insight is provided into how marital roles are affected when one takes precedence over another. When Agamemnon returns home he brings with him a immature woman, Cassandra. After arguing with his wife about not wanting to display excess hubris by walking on the color carpet their time together becomes very strained. Shortly after his return Clytemnestra murders Agamemnon and Cassandra.Her catharsis is complete after committ ing these murders and uses the sacrifice of Iphigenia as justification for her actions. both the love affair of Clytemnestra with Aegisthus and Agamemnon with Cassandra hint that perhaps there were a flyspeck bit more public scandalous acts that took place in Ancient Greece than the other two texts let on. We have learned that in order to be a good wife she must protect her family and be loyal to her husband. The text written by Aeschylus explicitly proves that when a wife must choose between loyalty to her husband and protection of her family she will choose her family.Regardless of the obvious differences between this text and the two priors they all three present Ancient Greek gender and marital roles to be comprised of the same basic principles. That being said, all three illuminate a new characteristic. After analyzing all the texts it can be assumed that Greek culture revolved around family, loyalty, and honor. A good wife is a woman who puts her family first and remains loya l to her husband no matter what the circumstances. in like manner a good husband defends the honor of himself whilst remaining devoted to his family.Nonetheless, after further analysis it can be argued that social norms for marital roles did not always go hand in hand with what a good husband or wife should do. This is because certain roles are emphasized more than others. When a wife chooses her children over her husband or a man defends his honor at the outgrowth of his family he or she can no long fit into the paradigm for a good husband or wife. In another text written by Euripides, Medea, the view into the medieval is much different than that of Hippolytus or any of the other texts.That being said, it is crucial to analyze the new perspective in order to formulate an meliorate theory on what Ancient Greek marital roles used to be. Jason and Medea are married with children when Jason chooses to suddenly leave to marry the daughter of the king of Corinth. Euripides is insinua ting that in some instances male gender roles overpower their marital roles. As a Greek man it is his duty to gain honor and status as well as to create a family. However, as a Greek husband it is his duty to be devoted to his family and to never leave them.From this text we can infer that the desire of a man to achieve honor and status can lead some men to abandon their families. The prospect of one day being king is too much for Jason, he leaves and forgoes his marital roles. His choice to relieve himself of his duties as a husband infers that not all men in Ancient Greece were morally sound, taking a very loose interpretation of the word honor. Additionally, Medea involves herself in some actions that go against what would be considered socially preferable. Medea is distraught and angry after Jason abandons her and the children.She takes action by plotting to hurt Jason the way that he hurt her. Medea gives Jasons new wife a poisoned robe that burns her flesh off and murders her own two children in hopes to harm Jason. By murdering both Jasons wife and her children she is exhibiting retaliate with the only intention of benefiting herself. This act infers that there were many citizens of Ancient Greece who did not regard the normal social roles. Unlike Agamemnon who sacrificed his daughter to fulfill one of his societal roles, Medea acts completely outside of the norm by murdering her children in ice-cold blood.Euripides may potentially be trying to express that there are always going to be individuals that act radically opposite to what is at the time considered normal. A distinction that must be recognized is that between gender roles and marital roles with the understanding that they sometimes overlap. It seems as if more attention is placed on gender roles than marital roles. For instance, Odysseus chooses to cheat on his wife, Agamemnon sacrifices his daughter, Clytemnestra murders her husband, and Jason abandon his family.After analyzing all of the texts we can finally make an educated decision on what marital and gender roles were like in Ancient Greece. It appears that Ancient Greek society had determined roles for both men and women and they were meant to be adamantly revered. A good husband was considered to be a man who was devoted to his family and defended the honor of himself and his home. He recognized that there is no honor in nuisance loved ones, no matter what the outcome. Additionally, a good wife was a woman who was completely loyal to her husband and her family, protecting them by some(prenominal) means necessary.However, thorough analysis reveals that there were often times people who went against what would be deemed good because they made a choice when roles conflicted that ensued a consequence for a loved one to bear. And finally there were those who went against the grain completely. Overall, Ancient Greek social norms involved family at the center and devotion from every member to each other. The reason there is such a strong emphasis placed on understanding, documenting, and analyzing history is because it is through historical analysis that scholars can infer as to how modern-day culture came to be.It is through investigating of historical texts and other mediums of recording history that allows us to track the emanation of people and their roles in society. In the current era people are still learning more about how past societies operated and what led to their development. From Homer to Hemmingway there is always more that can be learned through textual analysis, whether it be a historical primary source or not. 1 . Struck, Peter T. ClSt 200 Greek Tragedy. ClSt 200 Greek Tragedy. N. p. , 2000. Web. 11 Nov. 2012. .